I decided the other day that instead of a bucket list, perhaps I should have a list of things I should know. I mean, we should all know a great deal of things (I'm taking this wildly out of context, but as we all remember from Hosea 4:6, knowledge is kind of important. Never reject it. The verse obviously isn't talking about cumulonimbus clouds or anything, but I'm simply making the point that knowledge=important), plus, learn something new every day (my father would be so proud), but I feel like maybe I should have a list of things I should know/do/have. And since I really do love lists quite a bit, I thought I'd turn my hypothetical musing into an actual list of things in no particular order. I'm sure this isn't complete, but it's just sort of stuff that comes to mind.
Knitting. I feel like every virtuous girl should be able to knit. I... cannot. Yet. My friend Joy knows how, so maybe whenever I get around to visiting her, we can have a little session wherein she teaches me and I attempt to learn.
Have a cool vocabulary word. My mom just found solidus the other day, which is basically a cooler/more intelligent-sounding word for, well, slash. Good call, Muth. I like to have a word and use it often enough so that I might never forget it. Then I move on to a new one. I tought everyone insouciant a while ago, just because I found it and it's swell. I like to use words other than "like" and "um," though they do have their place. Places. Oh, and recently I was bringing back forsooth, and it sort of worked. I have friends who use forsooth now. I love it.
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. I was determined to know what it meant, because I always get it confused with the Higgs Boson thing, and after a long time of seeing stuff about the God Particle in the news, I decided to set it to rights in my head which was which. So far, I never remember what the Higgs Boson thing is all about, but when I remember, I review the Uncertainty Principle in my head, just for kicks. "It's impossible to simultaneously find the position and velocity of a subatomic particle. It's impossible to simultaneously find the position and velocity of a subatomic particle." I don't even know if that's 100% correct, but I had to break it down into layman's terms so I could even figure out what the principle was about. No wonder they're so uncertain.
Have a favorite verse. I read a book recently where the girl claimed the "In all things we are more than conquerors" verse and would quote it about every other page. Personally, I'm still working on finding one. I have different verses for different occasions. For instance, I have a whole selection of verses for morning times. I have Rejoice Evermore on my wall by the postcards I collect from my cool vacations, so as to remind me that ever situation and place is rejoiceable. I (mis)quote the second half of Matthew 26:41 when I work out. I remind myself of the first part of 2 Cor. 12:15 when I'm doing someone else's work for them and I know I should have a better attitude about it. I I have other verses for other occasions, but I won't expand tediously on this point. This point being that no, I don't have an all-time favorite verse. Yet. Perhaps I never shall. I just sort of have a bunch I use at different times. But I feel like I should have One Really Special Verse For All Occasions. We shall see.
Know something cool about science. My dad knows a lot of stuff about stars and... other sky-related things. He has made it a habit to utilize the tools we have available to us in this modern age and learn. That's cool. I decided a while ago to re-learn stuff about clouds. When I was in sixth grade or thereabouts, I had to know the difference between the cirrus and cumulus and all those types of clouds. I'm ashamed to say that I can't remember them any more. So I have resolved to learn something really cool (what? clouds are cool!) and retain it in my feeble memory.
Figure out the Bible chronologically speaking. I'm not going to lie. For as many times as I've read through those Old Testament books, I still get hung up on which prophet was around when which king was reigning, and when those Persians came into play, and who was doing what. It's hard to get it straight. So I've been working on having a better grasp of what comes when.
Hepygroga. I had a teacher in school who used to refer to geography as "hepygroga," which is an anagram of geography. Anyhow, his point was that when you don't know where things belong, it's much more difficult to sort things out in your head. Much like a proper chronology of the Bible is bound to help me when I read the Bible, a proper idea of geography will help me as I hear/read/observe the world around me. Honestly, I'm terrible at geography. The other day we were discussing In Search of the Source (great book) and whether or not the book is set in Papua New Guinea, and I couldn't even remember where that was. So yeah, I've got work to do. Sometimes I go to Google Maps (or Google Earth, whichever), and just sort of scroll around the world, seeking where I might learn more. There are a lot of countries. Goodness.
Have better handwriting. At the urging my sister, who gently (coughcoughornotsogentlycoughcough) told me that my handwriting isn't even at an 8th grade level, I started working on handwriting with my younger sister. We practice for about a half hour a day. It'll probably still be an 8th grade level (I am what I am, alas), but you know what? I'm working on it. I am trying.
When to speak up and when to shut up. This one speaks for itself.
Know what a gerund is. My mom does. She knows all those things about participles and parenthetical clauses. I think that's genius. To me, a gerund is confusing. How can it do so much stuff? I mean, "ing"ing stuff is a good enough job description, so why overachieve and perform as a subject, object, or whatever else it does?
Imaginary numbers. I am sorry to admit, that I was rather... questionable at math. And then I got to the part about imaginary numbers, and I thought, "They're just MAKING THIS UP????????" and I stopped paying attention. One day I should really go back and figure out what an imaginary number is. Honestly, I couldn't even begin to tell you. That's so shameful.
ROY G. BIV. Because everyone should have a tried-and-true way to remember the rainbow colors. I also use a little acrostic (That He Just Peter Loves Grapes... virtue, praise) to help me remember Philippians 4:8. And I still sing the Books of the Bible song in my head to help me remember where to find Ezra and Nehemiah. I find it not at all shameful to get a little help from time to time.
Learn the rules to a game. I one time Do Hard Things by the Harris Twins, and they said to do things outside of your comfort zone, and especially do more than just the things that come naturally to you. So, while I don't think it's at all important in the slightest to learn the rules to football or baseball or another sports-type game that I have zero interest in whatsoever, I figure that next time somebody tries to explain such rules to me, I'll pay attention and thank them for their time.
Know when it's appropriate to follow a recipe--or not. I've gone over this before, but but I find it easier to not follow recipes. I'm doing my best to actually follow recipes in earnest. It's not very fun. I feel sorry for methodical people.
Anyhow, I could think of more things to list about, but then next time any of you ask me about it ("What kind of cloud is that? Oh, you don't know? What happened to that list?") I'd rather have fewer items to feel obliged to learn. So I shall end it with this paragraph upon which you are gazing now. This is truly the end of this post. Now I go forth and learn, my friends!
Showing posts with label Matthew. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matthew. Show all posts
Monday, April 16, 2012
Things I Ought to Know
Labels:
books,
cooking,
Corinthians,
Ezra,
football,
Hosea,
left/right,
lists,
math,
Matthew,
Nehemiah,
Philippians,
Romans,
science,
sports,
Thessalonians,
words
Friday, September 23, 2011
Judge not
This has nothing to do with judging in the traditional manner. It's just that sometimes I need to examine my own beam before I look at my sibling's mote. I have a sister who has some unusuually named children. Which is fine. I'm just saying.
However, you know Thomas? Remember him? One of his train pals is a friend named Skarloey. And... I like the name. I'd spell it differently, and use it as a name for a girl, but honestly, I kind of love it. Say it a few times. It grows on you.
So anyhow, it's just a good reminder for me to, you know, stop raising my eyebrows at all the Apples and Moons of this world.
No, seriously. Say the name again. Skarloey. Mm? Also, Skarloey is a very helpful train, and a good friend. Good role model right off the bat. Yay!
However, you know Thomas? Remember him? One of his train pals is a friend named Skarloey. And... I like the name. I'd spell it differently, and use it as a name for a girl, but honestly, I kind of love it. Say it a few times. It grows on you.
So anyhow, it's just a good reminder for me to, you know, stop raising my eyebrows at all the Apples and Moons of this world.
No, seriously. Say the name again. Skarloey. Mm? Also, Skarloey is a very helpful train, and a good friend. Good role model right off the bat. Yay!
Monday, January 3, 2011
All things
I was enjoying a verse from Proverbs 28 this morning, that goes, "Evil men understand not judgment: but they that seek the Lord understand all things." It's sort of a surprising verse to read, being that is says that they that seek the Lord will understand everything.
All things? Seriously? I don't know about you guys, but the ability to understand all things would come in mighty handy now and again. I'm pretty sure that through our relationship with the Lord we understand what we need to for a fulfilled life in Him, but it's interesting to think that if we truly sought the Lord He would show us all things.
Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you: for every one that asketh receiveth: and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened. Matthew 7:7, 8
All things? Seriously? I don't know about you guys, but the ability to understand all things would come in mighty handy now and again. I'm pretty sure that through our relationship with the Lord we understand what we need to for a fulfilled life in Him, but it's interesting to think that if we truly sought the Lord He would show us all things.
Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you: for every one that asketh receiveth: and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened. Matthew 7:7, 8
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Misspeaks
Last night 'round the dinner table we were remembering some particularly funny times when someone has been reading the Bible and spoke amiss. My all-time favorite was when my little sister was just learning how to read and we were reading the parable of the guy who sent his only son and she said, "This is the hair; come, let us kill him, and let us squeeze on his inheritance." And I just laughed. Nobody else remembers, but I wrote a note in my Bible, and every time I come across it I just have to laugh.
Then, of course, were the time when we'd have Bible study at our house for the neighbourhood teens, and every once in a while they'd say something funny. Like once my dad asked what "swine" were (parable of the prodigal son) and one girl said, "they're those, like, pretty white birds?" No, no, those are swans.
At Sunday School once a boy whom I've always thought of as pretty with it was asked what a "pardon" was. "A.... squirrel?" No, Lorenzo, that's not it.
Back to the dinner table. Once, when my grandma was still with us, she was at our house for breakfast and our family reading happened to be in Matthew 11. My grandma wasn't paying much attention (being 93 will do that to you), and so when it came time for her to read she didn't know where we were. So my mom, being ever helpful, started out the verse for her and pointed her in the right direction. "Woe unto thee, Mummy," she said, hoping that my grandma would pick up from there.
So my grandma repeated after her. Verbatim.
"Woe unto thee, Mummy."
We all cracked up, and my poor grandma didn't understand why we thought it was funny. Needless to say, I can't ever seem to read about Chorazin without remembering my dear grandmother saying, "Woe unto thee, Mummy."
I remember someone once mis-reading loaves and fishes as "loaves and smishes." Two words: Church. Giggles.
Then, of course, were the time when we'd have Bible study at our house for the neighbourhood teens, and every once in a while they'd say something funny. Like once my dad asked what "swine" were (parable of the prodigal son) and one girl said, "they're those, like, pretty white birds?" No, no, those are swans.
At Sunday School once a boy whom I've always thought of as pretty with it was asked what a "pardon" was. "A.... squirrel?" No, Lorenzo, that's not it.
Back to the dinner table. Once, when my grandma was still with us, she was at our house for breakfast and our family reading happened to be in Matthew 11. My grandma wasn't paying much attention (being 93 will do that to you), and so when it came time for her to read she didn't know where we were. So my mom, being ever helpful, started out the verse for her and pointed her in the right direction. "Woe unto thee, Mummy," she said, hoping that my grandma would pick up from there.
So my grandma repeated after her. Verbatim.
"Woe unto thee, Mummy."
We all cracked up, and my poor grandma didn't understand why we thought it was funny. Needless to say, I can't ever seem to read about Chorazin without remembering my dear grandmother saying, "Woe unto thee, Mummy."
I remember someone once mis-reading loaves and fishes as "loaves and smishes." Two words: Church. Giggles.
Friday, April 30, 2010
If thy foot offends thee--
Cut it off!
Just kidding.
But I did step on a toy train the other day (Percy, I believe) and ever since that time, my feet have been uncomfortable to use. And I do mean that. A bruised sole does not feel very nice. If my feet could somehow be wrapped in bubble wrap (which would come with the built-in-charm of having boredom busted at a moment's notice!) or maybe something equally created to take the pressure off my feet, it would be awesome.
It's been making me think, though. Some frightening words, yes. Me? Thinking?
I've been reading through Leviticus (sort of at a snail's pace, due to me actually trying to pay attention to the feasts and diseases and other odd things Leviticus teaches us) and multiple times in the book, it mentions that when offerings/consecration were going on (consecration: another one of my favourite topics!) there was blood put on the ear (the right ear, to be exact. And not just any place on the ear, but the tip of the ear), the hand (again, the right one. Personally, I think this means that left-handed people aren't as sanctified as the rest of us. Which worries me, because I'm sort of confused in the matter of which-handed I am), and the great toe on the right foot (never calling it a big toe again: Great Toe sounds much better!) during this process.
Which, obviously, reminds us to watch where we go, what we do, and what we listen to. I know we sort of pretend that we don't have any control over what goes in and out of our ears ("I heard it on the bus!") but we have a lot more control over such things than we think.
I just ran out of steam (haha, like Percy the train is liable to do). I don't remember where I was going with this except to say that while my bruised foot has been causing me grief, it makes me consider in much greater detail exactly how much my feet mean to me. I love them, I use them, and I'd best watch where they walk. Amen!
*wanders away, humming, "Oh be careful little feet where you go" while trying to drown out the sound of the world all around*
Just kidding.
But I did step on a toy train the other day (Percy, I believe) and ever since that time, my feet have been uncomfortable to use. And I do mean that. A bruised sole does not feel very nice. If my feet could somehow be wrapped in bubble wrap (which would come with the built-in-charm of having boredom busted at a moment's notice!) or maybe something equally created to take the pressure off my feet, it would be awesome.
It's been making me think, though. Some frightening words, yes. Me? Thinking?
I've been reading through Leviticus (sort of at a snail's pace, due to me actually trying to pay attention to the feasts and diseases and other odd things Leviticus teaches us) and multiple times in the book, it mentions that when offerings/consecration were going on (consecration: another one of my favourite topics!) there was blood put on the ear (the right ear, to be exact. And not just any place on the ear, but the tip of the ear), the hand (again, the right one. Personally, I think this means that left-handed people aren't as sanctified as the rest of us. Which worries me, because I'm sort of confused in the matter of which-handed I am), and the great toe on the right foot (never calling it a big toe again: Great Toe sounds much better!) during this process.
Which, obviously, reminds us to watch where we go, what we do, and what we listen to. I know we sort of pretend that we don't have any control over what goes in and out of our ears ("I heard it on the bus!") but we have a lot more control over such things than we think.
I just ran out of steam (haha, like Percy the train is liable to do). I don't remember where I was going with this except to say that while my bruised foot has been causing me grief, it makes me consider in much greater detail exactly how much my feet mean to me. I love them, I use them, and I'd best watch where they walk. Amen!
*wanders away, humming, "Oh be careful little feet where you go" while trying to drown out the sound of the world all around*
Labels:
Leviticus,
Matthew,
singing,
Thomas and Friends
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Purchased
On the topic of parables, here's a good one. The story of the guy who found the pearl of great price, went and sold all that he had, and bought the field--what did he sell? And from whom did he buy?
I guess I should have capitalized all of that, because the "he" in the story represents Christ. Actually, are we supposed to capitalize pronouns that don't actually entirely refer to the Lord? I'm not sure.
Moving on.
We all talk about how we were purchased with the blood of Christ, bought with a price, etc. And that's good, that's from the Bible (1 Corinthians 6:20, for example), but from whom were we purchased? Was the transaction with the Father? Were we purchased by the Son from the Father? Because I certainly don't think that Jesus was transacting with Satan or anything like that. So we were purchased, saved from the clutches of sin, but from whom?
And in the parable, the merchant sold all that he had, and purchased the field with the pearl in it. What did Jesus have to give up in coming to Earth to save us? He didn't give up His Deity, nor did He give up His place at the right hand of God. I guess it's one of those things that I won't know until Glory.
And once again, if we were smart enough to understand God, well, that just wouldn't make sense, would it? =)
I guess I should have capitalized all of that, because the "he" in the story represents Christ. Actually, are we supposed to capitalize pronouns that don't actually entirely refer to the Lord? I'm not sure.
Moving on.
We all talk about how we were purchased with the blood of Christ, bought with a price, etc. And that's good, that's from the Bible (1 Corinthians 6:20, for example), but from whom were we purchased? Was the transaction with the Father? Were we purchased by the Son from the Father? Because I certainly don't think that Jesus was transacting with Satan or anything like that. So we were purchased, saved from the clutches of sin, but from whom?
And in the parable, the merchant sold all that he had, and purchased the field with the pearl in it. What did Jesus have to give up in coming to Earth to save us? He didn't give up His Deity, nor did He give up His place at the right hand of God. I guess it's one of those things that I won't know until Glory.
And once again, if we were smart enough to understand God, well, that just wouldn't make sense, would it? =)
Labels:
Bible,
Corinthians,
crucifixion,
Matthew,
parable,
salvation
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Asking about Acts - Part II
Let's talk for just a minute about Acts 27. Great chapter, truly it is, but there's one thing I always hear about it that sort of gets to me. Which is to say, Acts 27:29. "Then fearing lest we should have fallen upon rocks, they cast four anchors out of the stern, and wished for day."
The romantical side of me just likes to hear about a ship full of people wishing for day. Sounds cool (especially since you know they all survived at the end, phew), but it's the four anchors I hear a lot about. I'm not sure if any of the rest of you hear about these four anchors, but I highly recommend that if you're not familiar with a good sermon or two on the subject, that you head over to Google and, well, google it. "Acts 27 four anchors" is all it takes to come up with dozens of thoughts on these anchors.
I hear all sort of thoughts about them. Article number one on that Google search says that the four anchors are representative of Paul's steadiness in the storm. 1. He was in the presence of God, 2. He was God's possession, 3. He had a sense of purpose, and 4. He had a positive confession of his faith.
Well, these things are all good and right, but is that really what those four anchors represent?
Another article (also in the top ten Google listings under the search for "Acts 20 four anchors") says that the four anchors were that Paul 1. Prayed, 2. Had the Word of God, 3. Obeyed God, and 4. Had the hope of salvation. Once again, great things, but is that what those anchors mean?
I've heard other things. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, if you'll believe it, were once referred to as the four anchors. In Acts 2:42 mentions new Christians continuing steadfastly in 1. The apostle's doctrine, 2. fellowship, 3. Breaking of bread, and 4. prayers. That's pretty popular from what I've personally heard.
Anyhow, there are more, which doubtless I'll remember in the middle of the night tonight, but you get the idea.
Now, I'm not trying to be contrary (although I realize I come off as sort of contrary sometimes), but I'm trying to be practical, I guess. My hang-up with this whole situation is this: why are we comparing things to these anchors, anyhow? The anchors sure didn't help the ship, did they? This was a ship that, if we're trying to compare apples to apples, wouldn't even be qualified as a Christian ship (re-read the chapter, I'm sure it'll make sense in a moment!). So the illustration is already a little flimsy, in my opinion.
So, like I say, we have a ship who'd been trying, on its own merit, to reach land, cast these four anchors into the sea, and, well, that didn't work either. The ship broke in pieces, much like Humpty Dumpty, I imagine, only with less yolk.
May I reiterate: why do we like this illustration so much? These four anchors gave those sea-sick people not one ounce of help, and I'd like to keep viewing prayer and obedience to God as something that'll help me, thanks for asking. I once decided that I was going to sermonize all on my own, and started telling people that I thought that the four anchors referred to Jacob's four wifely things. Moral of that story? Have just one wife. For some reason that doctrine never really caught on, funny... =)
This really solved nothing, I suppose, but it felt nice to spit it all out.
The romantical side of me just likes to hear about a ship full of people wishing for day. Sounds cool (especially since you know they all survived at the end, phew), but it's the four anchors I hear a lot about. I'm not sure if any of the rest of you hear about these four anchors, but I highly recommend that if you're not familiar with a good sermon or two on the subject, that you head over to Google and, well, google it. "Acts 27 four anchors" is all it takes to come up with dozens of thoughts on these anchors.
I hear all sort of thoughts about them. Article number one on that Google search says that the four anchors are representative of Paul's steadiness in the storm. 1. He was in the presence of God, 2. He was God's possession, 3. He had a sense of purpose, and 4. He had a positive confession of his faith.
Well, these things are all good and right, but is that really what those four anchors represent?
Another article (also in the top ten Google listings under the search for "Acts 20 four anchors") says that the four anchors were that Paul 1. Prayed, 2. Had the Word of God, 3. Obeyed God, and 4. Had the hope of salvation. Once again, great things, but is that what those anchors mean?
I've heard other things. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, if you'll believe it, were once referred to as the four anchors. In Acts 2:42 mentions new Christians continuing steadfastly in 1. The apostle's doctrine, 2. fellowship, 3. Breaking of bread, and 4. prayers. That's pretty popular from what I've personally heard.
Anyhow, there are more, which doubtless I'll remember in the middle of the night tonight, but you get the idea.
Now, I'm not trying to be contrary (although I realize I come off as sort of contrary sometimes), but I'm trying to be practical, I guess. My hang-up with this whole situation is this: why are we comparing things to these anchors, anyhow? The anchors sure didn't help the ship, did they? This was a ship that, if we're trying to compare apples to apples, wouldn't even be qualified as a Christian ship (re-read the chapter, I'm sure it'll make sense in a moment!). So the illustration is already a little flimsy, in my opinion.
So, like I say, we have a ship who'd been trying, on its own merit, to reach land, cast these four anchors into the sea, and, well, that didn't work either. The ship broke in pieces, much like Humpty Dumpty, I imagine, only with less yolk.
May I reiterate: why do we like this illustration so much? These four anchors gave those sea-sick people not one ounce of help, and I'd like to keep viewing prayer and obedience to God as something that'll help me, thanks for asking. I once decided that I was going to sermonize all on my own, and started telling people that I thought that the four anchors referred to Jacob's four wifely things. Moral of that story? Have just one wife. For some reason that doctrine never really caught on, funny... =)
This really solved nothing, I suppose, but it felt nice to spit it all out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)